The Cherokee Nation's "Ethnic Cleansing" Is Not Acceptable

I could not believe what I was learning: The descendants of Native Americans who once owned slaves and later under a federal treaty and other legalities, made the slaves and their descendants citizens in the Cherokee Nation, were stripping them of their rights. The audacity! The racism! The greed! See how the official Cherokee newspaper, The Phoenix, reported this: http://www.cherokeephoenix.org/News/News.aspx?StoryID=2480

The New York Times explains some of the background to this in a Mar. 8 editorial (www.nytimes.com):

“This bitter dispute dates to the treaties of 1866, when the Cherokee, Seminole and Creek agreed to admit their former slaves as tribal members in return for recognition as sovereign nations. The tribes fought black membership from the start — even though many of the former slaves were products of mixed black and Indian marriages.

“The federal courts repeatedly upheld the treaties. But the federal government fanned the flames when a government commission set out in the 1890s to create an authoritative roll of tribal membership. Instead of placing everyone on a single roll, it made two lists. The so-called blood list contained nonblack Cherokees, listed with their percentage of Indian ancestry. The freedmen’s list included the names of any black members, even those with significant Cherokee ancestry.”

The actual election results – 3 to 1 for expelling descendants of slaves from membership, including access to health and educational benefits as well as any profits from tribal gambling enterprises -- can be seen at the official tribal site: http://www.cherokee.org/TribalGovernment/Election/home.aspx?section=ResultsSE&year=2007

At www.indianz.com, Tim Giago offers an explanation, but reaches, as far as I am concerned, an untenable conclusion. See: http://www.indianz.com/News/2007/001790.asp

We sometimes gloss over the complicated history between Native Americans and Black Americans. But, since attending a journalism convention some years ago in Atlanta, where journalists of color – including Native Americans and Blacks, among others – I have never forgotten how the Cherokees in their capital city, New Echota, thought of themselves as White as any “actual” White Southerners. (http://gastateparks.org/info/echota/) Now some of them are behaving like the Whites in the Thomas Jefferson family who refuse to acknowledge Black descendants of Jefferson, refusing them such benefits as membership in various Jefferson societies and the right to burial on the Jefferson estate in Virginia.

Of course, there are dissidents among any group. So there are members of the Cherokee Nation who are fighting against the expulsion of the Cherokee Freedman, just as some White Jefferson family members challenge the exclusion of Black Jefferson descendants.

A member of the Cherokee tribal council, Taylor Keen, has been quoted in various newspapers as saying: “This is a sad chapter in Cherokee history. But this is not my Cherokee Nation. My Cherokee Nation is one that honors all parts of her past.”

Now it is up to the courts, and perhaps the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, to prevent this injustice being perpetrated by a people who should recall how much the tribe suffered when forced out of Southern states in the 1800s. The Trail of Tears, this episode was called. Now, perhaps the way that abused children often become abusers, the Cherokee Nation is promoting a 21st century version of that Trail of Tears.